Looking for:
Adobe indesign cs6 vs cc 2015 free |
Photoshop vs Photoshop CC | Top 5 Most Useful Differences To Know.Solved: What is the difference CS6 & CC Versions? - Adobe Support Community -
Close Privacy Overview This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website.
We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary Necessary. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent.
You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary Necessary. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
My Mac mini is tolerably fast—a 2. In an earlier posting, I suggested the memory allocation may be flawed. And prices have gone down. Nor do they care—hence removing the headphone jack from the iPhone 7. Personally, I respect them more if they were openly greedly rather than offer bogus excuses. You can find out how much memory you can add to your particular Mac. If you can afford it, you might also look into adding an SSD:. Ujff6-BvC- —-.
If the issue is swapping the document files as opposed to the ID app itself then that may help. Funny how that never came up in any of my searches either. It did have one positive impact. The load time for a page book with some two-dozen pictures went from 10 seconds, which is certainly tolerable, to an amazing 2 seconds. Thing is, why are SO many people having this same problem with just one app and not the whole thing?
Is Adobe talking about it? Even Microsoft Office is flawless in comparison! I never, ever thought I would say that. So, what is it with InDesign? Is it coming to the end of its life? Not helpful, I know. Adobe clearly favors some products and families of products over others. Photoshop is at the top. Video and audio editing also seem to get a lot of attention, as does UI developement tools.
InDesign is almost ignored. It could also be just a matter of executive egos. Audio and video editing is flashy. Adobe executives may see ID as a feature-complete product. Also, keep in mind that Adobe is improving ID. Fonts, stock photos, and similar CC assets do benefit ID users. But that too is at the periphery.
Not endnotes. No decent main dictionary. No project or document specific dictionary. Adobe, Apple and Microsoft all exploit Hunspell but give it little money.
The fact that Adobe had to make a big deal about glyph selection in ID illustrates that. In a good upgrade, that would have been a mere addendum. And add to that the fact that ID , with is sluggishness and crashing, seems to be a poorer product than than ID Going with one this late would push the one into I can understand your frustration, as I had to turn work away on the weekend owing the unreliability of ID — non-stop crashing.
After all the ups and downs over the past three years, it was the final straw and I cancelled my subscription. They were great people to know. The result morale problem may be why, a few years back, the ID program manager let developers choose one special project for themselves, some one feature they wanted ID to have.
RAM is a good illustration. If you can get the work done with an older computer with but 2 Gig of RAM, he sees no reason to buy you more.
For you, time is money. For him, hardware is money. And alas, these cheap bosses often carry a lot of weight with companies such as Adobe.
You and I buy one CC package at a time and use it heavily. These bosses determine whether hundred of people under them use ID or not—or at least how many employees will use ID or be stuck with Word. And these cheap bosses, whom I might add mean well, are more interested in whether ID will run in 2 Gig of RAM than whether it will run faster in 16 Gig.
And I do see their rationale, without some checks in place, employees will go for more computer than they need and more software than they can use. I have worked in various advertising agencies over the years. Limited their product features and capabilities to control how you use it. Not to mention hardware. Even software is limited and more expensive. Instead of working with Adobe, they decided to kill Flash.
Which is why I think this whole InDesign issue you guys are having is due to restrictions set in place by Apple. Why Are their products do damn expensive? The richer they get, the richer they want to be. Look at what Apple did to evade EU taxes. I watched that from Seattle and saw it wash the mystique off Microsoft and I saw friends who work for the company go from enthusiastic to guilty.
Fighting those EU taxes will do the same for Apple. Instead, Apple puts too little RAM in its base product Macs, tablets and phones and then charges four times the market price to get a decent amount. This model has everything I need. Anton, No haters! Now I just use Macs because of one word: Vista!
Haha, Vista was a mistake. I think the good thing about Microsoft getting slapped around by competition is the fact that they are trying really hard to fix things and make a new name for themselves. I remember I used to tell people Apples were so awesome because they never crash like PCs. Up yours adobe. InDesign CC behaves as if they are not there. My current plan of action is to copy up to page and save it to a text file, then do the same with page onwards; combine them and save AGAIN to a text file.
This will involve several hours tedious work for me, unless anyone has a better idea. Of course, this cure will only last until I accidentally perform the unlisted key combination that inserted the 46 pages in the first place.
Check the text flow and see if p. If it does, simply use the Pages panel to delete those blank pages and the problem is solved. Doing that may have even triggered the problem you have. Scrivener and several kindred apps make far more sense for writing. They let you focus on the content rather than the layout and make moving a scene from chapter 7 to chapter 9 much easier. There are several such apps on the market, including StoryList and Ulysses. All are intended to make book writing easier, so you might want to try several before committing.
I went with Scrivener years ago and have never felt the need for any other app. With its built-in outliner, it works well for those who write from an outline. You can do what I do and just throw down ideas and arrange them later. Indeed, I have long suspected that Microsoft not only deliberately makes the UI of their Office apps difficult, but changes them every few years so that business and their employees get locked into that UI.
And yeah, I did get into a Word tirade. What writers and publishers need is a descriptive-free, tagged format. It defines what a word or block of text is while specifiying absolutely nothing about how it looks. First-level headings would be describe as such but not defined as bold or larger than body text. I think there are reasons for this failing.
They babble about what they want said, and someone else gets stuck with the details. That tagged-by-meaning approach would make users more platform and app independent. One reason I do my own writing, editing and publishing is that I experienced the publishing industry approach when I did a little writing for the giant Pearson back in the late s. There are staff at those companies who will defend to their dying breath clumsy, Word-based workflows that date back to the late s.
As an independent, I need not deal with that. I do what works best. The idea that giving staff good hardware could save time and money is beyond him. It has to be done well to be worthwhile. Will Word let you tag every item in that outline with a keyword and display only those with a certain tag? Scrivener will.
For fiction, does John know something in a scene before John is told it later? In history or biography, is a subject brought up before it is explained later? Manging that with a Word document or a series of them is horrid. Scrivener will let you selectively display items in an outline that deal with a specific theme or person. You can read them in sequence, excluding all else. And if you have a complex timeline, Scrivener will work with Aeon, an app specifically designed to manage timelines.
It is designed for writers. Word fans strike me as like those who think a Swiss Army knife and a crescent wrench are the only tools they need. Microsoft Office products typically add features so some tech pundit has something to write about and so corporate departments have reason to upgrade.
Yes, but does do that well? No, almost never. It did what was needed for writing and did it well. Since then, Microsoft has simply slapped on features and done so not just in some clumsy fashion, but changed how its done every few versions, lest its open-source competitors catch up. In my layout work, I often need to look at Word documents in the original.
Instead, I do like any talented craftsman would do and get the proper tool for any task. Not app can do everything well. Nothing could be further from the truth as I use Scrivener. Thank you for your swift and helpful responses. I am guilty of primary writing in InDesign and do take your point that it should be in Scrivener or similar.
The reason is historical. Michael W Perry, yes the text does reflow, missing out the 46 pages, it does re-connect when I delete the pages. So far so good. If the problem is sorted, I am happy. This also could be upsetting InDesign, it certainly opens the gate to accidental key combination mistakes.
The reasons you gave I understand and accept, thank you. Shihab S Joi, thank you for the insight into submitting manuscripts. I can be Sovereign in my own office, but I must accept that the World outside works to different rules.
It may even have been ish because I bought , installed it after breakfast one morning and uninstalled it before lunch the same day. But thank you for the tip, it might help others. This causes insert of empty pages. Do not use InDeign as an texteditor….
You are correct, Frans vd Geest, about the keys. I do use the enter key to force a new page on the occasions when one is required. It is remotely possible that I leaned on it for long enough to insert 46 pages into the middle of a sentence, without noticing. Development, I bought Scrivener this morning and plan to use it as my text editor. So nice to discover another person with unique thoughts on this subject. This web site is something that is needed on the web, someone with a bit of originality!
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page. Advanced Search. Forgot Password? Join today. Not a member? Recommended For You. He has worked in the graphic arts industry for more than 20 years and was the training manager for ten years at Rapid Lasergraphics.
He has taught computer graphics classes since June 15, at pm. Log in to Reply. Jon Kolman says:. June 16, at am. Garry says:. Frans van der Geesy says:. James Wamser says:. Peter Kahrel says:. David Blatner says:.
Ken Jones says:. Sandee Cohen says:. Eugene Tyson says:. Bob Levine says:. Michael W. Perry says:. Dwayne says:. June 18, at am. Gary Ferster says:. June 16, at pm. Jerry Bernard says:. June 27, at pm. July 7, at am. Justin Putney says:. Alan Gilbertson says:. Aspen Kuhlman says:. Devlin says:. Michael Stevens says:. June 17, at am. Steve Werner says:. Mike Perry says:. Don H says:. Anita says:. Mark says:. June 17, at pm. Harbs says:. Paul Chadha says:. Michael Monos says:. August 28, at am.
November 12, at am. Uwe Laubender says:. June 19, at am. Mark Hughes says:. June 25, at am. Richard Groff says:. JR Dastugue says:. June 20, at am. Steve Disney says:. June 19, at pm. June 23, at am. Harley says:. June 20, at pm. Chad says:. June 22, at pm. Mike Rankin says:. June 30, at pm. Frans van der Geest says:. June 24, at pm. Mark Bernard says:. July 1, at am. Anton says:. July 1, at pm. Brian Dee says:. July 2, at am. Amy says:. July 2, at pm. Remko Modderkolk says:. Create A Website says:.
July 7, at pm. Christia says:. July 9, at pm. Michael says:. July 30, at am. Tim says:. July 28, at am. Teressa says:. August 3, at am. Khlivnyuk says:. August 9, at pm. Anthony says:. August 11, at pm. August 20, at am. Michelle says:. August 20, at pm. Homero says:. September 1, at am. Mates says:. September 1, at pm. Doug says:. September 4, at pm. Dennis says:. December 5, at pm. January 11, at am.
Ben says:. November 20, at pm. November 27, at am. Hector C says:. February 26, at pm. Gavin Anderson says:. March 2, at am. David McCord says:. March 29, at am. Chevy Kaylor says:. May 2, at am.
Robert J Sutton says:. September 9, at am. TimH says:. September 21, at pm. Ken Benson says:. September 28, at am. Cheri says:. September 30, at am. Elysia says:. October 25, at pm. Steve says:. October 2, at am. Pam Lynch says:. April 7, at am. Laura Patmore says:. October 15, at am. Inkling says:. November 5, at am. Dennis Replogle says:.
October 15, at pm. Victor Forbes says:. November 14, at am. Dominic Carroll says:. November 26, at am. Michael W Perry says:. CateLiz says:. October 17, at am.
No comments:
Post a Comment